74 e coli tg Search Results


74 e coli tg  (ATCC)
97
ATCC 74 e coli tg
Fig. 1. Displacement study: changes in adhesion of <t>E.</t> <t>coli</t> ATCC 11775 and S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 when incubated with respective lactobacillus for different incubation time-periods. r, LGG+E. coli ATCC 11775; j, LGG+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028; m, LCS+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028.
74 E Coli Tg, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/74+e+coli+tg/Bacillus+Cereus/pm12972590-92-29-41
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
74 e coli tg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1. Displacement study: changes in adhesion of E. coli ATCC 11775 and S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 when incubated with respective lactobacillus for different incubation time-periods. r, LGG+E. coli ATCC 11775; j, LGG+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028; m, LCS+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028.

Journal: Journal of medical microbiology

Article Title: Displacement of bacterial pathogens from mucus and Caco-2 cell surface by lactobacilli.

doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05009-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Displacement study: changes in adhesion of E. coli ATCC 11775 and S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 when incubated with respective lactobacillus for different incubation time-periods. r, LGG+E. coli ATCC 11775; j, LGG+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028; m, LCS+S. typhimurium ATCC 14028.

Article Snippet: GI bacterium Change in adhesion, mean SD (%) Competition Exclusion Displacement E. coli O157 56·59 30·77 4·09 17·63 2·62 6·28 E. coli ATCC 11775 57·14 3·54* 4·20 2·81 6·11 1·74 E. coli TG-1 48·62 3·40* 1·73 2·69 0·55 7·38 S. enteritidis ATCC 13076 30·70 14·36* 19·72 12·90 13·04 10·35 S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 42·96 10·16* 36·28 6·61* 10·56 6·07 S. typhimurium E10 62·41 6·39* 27·35 3·75* 0·32 2·70 S. typhimurium E12 24·23 9·32* 15·86 8·73* 22·62 8·19 ‘S. bellurup’ E23 8·67 5·89 12·80 6·78 18·90 5·44 *Significantly different from control (Student’s t-test: P , 0·05).

Techniques: Incubation